fix(wpcarro/emacs): Fix list.el tests
I was getting false-positive ERT test results because I forgot to use the `should` macro in my assertions. I discovered this when debugging a subtle bug in cycle.el that depends on `list-contains?` return `t` or `nil` instead of truthy or falsy values. Change-Id: Ibbf89fd1c4f50f86d5efcaa4cd87280b97e111ce Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6003 Reviewed-by: wpcarro <wpcarro@gmail.com> Autosubmit: wpcarro <wpcarro@gmail.com> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This commit is contained in:
parent
8989dad5ed
commit
65fb82097b
3 changed files with 35 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
|
|||
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
||||
|
||||
(require 'dash)
|
||||
(require 'maybe)
|
||||
(require 'set)
|
||||
|
||||
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
||||
|
|
@ -73,7 +74,7 @@
|
|||
""
|
||||
(list-reduce (list-first xs)
|
||||
(lambda (x acc)
|
||||
(string-concat acc joint x))
|
||||
(format "%s%s%s" acc joint x))
|
||||
(list-tail xs))))
|
||||
|
||||
(defun list-length (xs)
|
||||
|
|
@ -151,12 +152,13 @@
|
|||
;; TODO: Add tests.
|
||||
(defun list-dedupe-adjacent (xs)
|
||||
"Return XS without adjacent duplicates."
|
||||
(list-reduce (list (list-first xs))
|
||||
(lambda (x acc)
|
||||
(if (equal x (list-first acc))
|
||||
acc
|
||||
(list-cons x acc)))
|
||||
xs))
|
||||
(list-reverse
|
||||
(list-reduce (list (list-first xs))
|
||||
(lambda (x acc)
|
||||
(if (equal x (list-first acc))
|
||||
acc
|
||||
(list-cons x acc)))
|
||||
xs)))
|
||||
|
||||
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
||||
;; Predicates
|
||||
|
|
@ -182,7 +184,7 @@ Be leery of using this with things like alists. Many data structures in Elisp
|
|||
|
||||
(defun list-contains? (x xs)
|
||||
"Return t if X is in XS using `equal'."
|
||||
(-contains? xs x))
|
||||
(maybe-some? (-contains? xs x)))
|
||||
|
||||
(defun list-xs-distinct-by? (f xs)
|
||||
"Return t if all elements in XS are distinct after applying F to each."
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue