fix(netencode/README): fix the example of ignored fields
Forgot this example when I changed the spec to ignore earlier duplicated fields. Change-Id: I9bc8d3e27201afd0d256aa4771b6420059fc68a7 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8949 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: Profpatsch <mail@profpatsch.de>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									43feacb64b
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						b4cfddfc80
					
				
					 1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
				
			
		| 
						 | 
					@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Similar to text, records start with the length of their *whole encoded content*,
 | 
				
			||||||
* A record with one empty field, `foo`: `{9:<3:foo|u,}`
 | 
					* A record with one empty field, `foo`: `{9:<3:foo|u,}`
 | 
				
			||||||
* A record with two fields, `foo` and `x`: `{21:<3:foo|u,<1:x|t3:baz,}`
 | 
					* A record with two fields, `foo` and `x`: `{21:<3:foo|u,<1:x|t3:baz,}`
 | 
				
			||||||
* The same record: `{21:<1:x|t3:baz,<3:foo|u,}`
 | 
					* The same record: `{21:<1:x|t3:baz,<3:foo|u,}`
 | 
				
			||||||
* The same record (later occurences of fields are ignored): `{28:<1:x|t3:baz,<3:foo|u,<1:x|u,}`
 | 
					* The same record (earlier occurences of fields are ignored): `{<1:x|u,28:<1:x|t3:baz,<3:foo|u,}`
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
### sums (tagged unions)
 | 
					### sums (tagged unions)
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
| 
						 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue