chore(tvix/castore): move data model docs to here

These describe the castore data model, so it should live in the castore
crate.
Also, some minor edits to //tvix/store/docs/api.md, to honor the move of
the castore bits to tvix-castore.

Change-Id: I1836556b652ac0592336eac95a8d0647599f4aec
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9893
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI

tvix/castore/docs/data-model.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Data model
+
+This provides some more notes on the fields used in castore.proto.
+
+See `//tvix/store/docs/api.md` for the full context.
+
+## Directory message
+`Directory` messages use the blake3 hash of their canonical protobuf
+serialization as its identifier.
+
+A `Directory` message contains three lists, `directories`, `files` and
+`symlinks`, holding `DirectoryNode`, `FileNode` and `SymlinkNode` messages
+respectively. They describe all the direct child elements that are contained in
+a directory.
+
+All three message types have a `name` field, specifying the (base)name of the
+element (which MUST not contain slashes or null bytes, and MUST not be '.' or '..').
+For reproducibility reasons, the lists MUST be sorted by that name and also
+MUST be unique across all three lists.
+
+In addition to the `name` field, the various *Node messages have the following
+fields:
+
+## DirectoryNode
+A `DirectoryNode` message represents a child directory.
+
+It has a `digest` field, which points to the identifier of another `Directory`
+message, making a `Directory` a merkle tree (or strictly speaking, a graph, as
+two elements pointing to a child directory with the same contents would point
+to the same `Directory` message.
+
+There's also a `size` field, containing the (total) number of all child
+elements in the referenced `Directory`, which helps for inode calculation.
+
+## FileNode
+A `FileNode` message represents a child (regular) file.
+
+Its `digest` field contains the blake3 hash of the file contents. It can be
+looked up in the `BlobService`.
+
+The `size` field contains the size of the blob the `digest` field refers to.
+
+The `executable` field specifies whether the file should be marked as
+executable or not.
+
+## SymlinkNode
+A `SymlinkNode` message represents a child symlink.
+
+In addition to the `name` field, the only additional field is the `target`,
+which is a string containing the target of the symlink.

tvix/castore/docs/why-not-git-trees.md

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+## Why not git tree objects?
+
+We've been experimenting with (some variations of) the git tree and object
+format, and ultimately decided against using it as an internal format, and
+instead adapted the one documented in the other documents here.
+
+While the tvix-store API protocol shares some similarities with the format used
+in git for trees and objects, the git one has shown some significant
+disadvantages:
+
+### The binary encoding itself
+
+#### trees
+The git tree object format is a very binary, error-prone and
+"made-to-be-read-and-written-from-C" format.
+
+Tree objects are a combination of null-terminated strings, and fields of known
+length. References to other tree objects use the literal sha1 hash of another
+tree object in this encoding.
+Extensions of the format/changes are very hard to do right, because parsers are
+not aware they might be parsing something different.
+
+The tvix-store protocol uses a canonical protobuf serialization, and uses
+the [blake3][blake3] hash of that serialization to point to other `Directory`
+messages.
+It's both compact and with a wide range of libraries for encoders and decoders
+in many programming languages.
+The choice of protobuf makes it easy to add new fields, and make old clients
+aware of some unknown fields being detected [^adding-fields].
+
+#### blob
+On disk, git blob objects start with a "blob" prefix, then the size of the
+payload, and then the data itself. The hash of a blob is the literal sha1sum
+over all of this - which makes it something very git specific to request for.
+
+tvix-store simply uses the [blake3][blake3] hash of the literal contents
+when referring to a file/blob, which makes it very easy to ask other data
+sources for the same data, as no git-specific payload is included in the hash.
+This also plays very well together with things like [iroh][iroh-discussion],
+which plans to provide a way to substitute (large)blobs by their blake3 hash
+over the IPFS network.
+
+In addition to that, [blake3][blake3] makes it possible to do
+[verified streaming][bao], as already described in other parts of the
+documentation.
+
+The git tree object format uses sha1 both for references to other trees and
+hashes of blobs, which isn't really a hash function to fundamentally base
+everything on in 2023.
+The [migration to sha256][git-sha256] also has been dead for some years now,
+and it's unclear how a "blake3" version of this would even look like.
+
+[bao]: https://github.com/oconnor663/bao
+[blake3]: https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3
+[git-sha256]: https://git-scm.com/docs/hash-function-transition/
+[iroh-discussion]: https://github.com/n0-computer/iroh/discussions/707#discussioncomment-5070197
+[^adding-fields]: Obviously, adding new fields will change hashes, but it's something that's easy to detect.