docs(web/snix/castore): port "why not git" document

Change-Id: I4ac77f264d2704018cd33dbf80746e82d193686e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.snix.dev/c/snix/+/30315
Reviewed-by: Domen Kožar <domen@cachix.org>
Tested-by: besadii
Autosubmit: Florian Klink <flokli@flokli.de>

snix/docs/src/SUMMARY.md

@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
 - [Store API](./store/api.md)
 - [BlobStore Chunking](./castore/blobstore-chunking.md)
 - [BlobStore Protocol](./castore/blobstore-protocol.md)
-- [Why not git trees?](./castore/why-not-git-trees.md)
 
 # Nix
 - [Specification of the Nix Language](./language-spec.md)

web/content/docs/components/castore/data-model.md

@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ name MUST be unique across all three lists.
 [rustdoc-node]: https://snix.dev/rustdoc/snix_castore/enum.Node.html
 [rustdoc-pathcomponent]: https://snix.dev/rustdoc/snix_castore/struct.PathComponent.html
 [BLAKE3]: https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3
-[^why-not-git-trees]: For a detailed comparison with the git model, and what (and why we do differently, see TODO LINK)
+[^why-not-git-trees]: For a detailed comparison with the git model, and what (and why we do differently, see [here]({{< relref "why-not-git.md" >}}))
 [^directory-digest]: We currently use the [BLAKE3][] digest of the protobuf
                      serialization of the `proto::Directory` struct to calculate
                      these digests. While pretty stable across most

web/content/docs/components/castore/why-not-git.md

@@ -1,16 +1,23 @@
-## Why not git tree objects?
+---
+title: "Why not Git?"
+summary: ""
+date: 2025-04-04T16:16:37+00:00
+lastmod: 2025-04-04T16:16:37+00:00
+draft: false
+weight: 42
+toc: false
+---
 
 We've been experimenting with (some variations of) the git tree and object
 format, and ultimately decided against using it as an internal format, and
-instead adapted the one documented in the other documents here.
+instead adapted our own [Data Model][castore-data-model].
 
-While the tvix-store API protocol shares some similarities with the format used
-in git for trees and objects, the git one has shown some significant
-disadvantages:
+While castore shares some similarities with the format used in git for trees and
+objects, the git one has shown some significant disadvantages:
 
 ### The binary encoding itself
 
-#### trees
+#### git trees
 The git tree object format is a very binary, error-prone and
 "made-to-be-read-and-written-from-C" format.
 
@@ -20,22 +27,23 @@ tree object in this encoding.
 Extensions of the format/changes are very hard to do right, because parsers are
 not aware they might be parsing something different.
 
-The tvix-store protocol uses a canonical protobuf serialization, and uses
-the [blake3][blake3] hash of that serialization to point to other `Directory`
-messages.
+The [Snix Castore Data Model][castore-data-model] uses a canonical protobuf
+serialization, and uses the [blake3][blake3] hash of that serialization to point
+to other `Directory` messages.
 It's both compact and with a wide range of libraries for encoders and decoders
 in many programming languages.
 The choice of protobuf makes it easy to add new fields, and make old clients
 aware of some unknown fields being detected [^adding-fields].
 
-#### blob
+#### git blob
 On disk, git blob objects start with a "blob" prefix, then the size of the
 payload, and then the data itself. The hash of a blob is the literal sha1sum
 over all of this - which makes it something very git specific to request for.
 
-tvix-store simply uses the [blake3][blake3] hash of the literal contents
-when referring to a file/blob, which makes it very easy to ask other data
-sources for the same data, as no git-specific payload is included in the hash.
+The [Snix Castore Data Model][castore-data-model] simply uses the
+[blake3][blake3] hash of the literal contents when referring to a file/blob,
+which makes it very easy to ask other data sources for the same data, as no
+git-specific payload is included in the hash.
 This also plays very well together with things like [iroh][iroh-discussion],
 which plans to provide a way to substitute (large)blobs by their blake3 hash
 over the IPFS network.
@@ -52,6 +60,7 @@ and it's unclear what a "blake3" version of this would even look like.
 
 [bao]: https://github.com/oconnor663/bao
 [blake3]: https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3
+[castore-data-model]: {{< relref "data-model.md" >}}
 [git-sha256]: https://git-scm.com/docs/hash-function-transition/
 [iroh-discussion]: https://github.com/n0-computer/iroh/discussions/707#discussioncomment-5070197
 [^adding-fields]: Obviously, adding new fields will change hashes, but it's something that's easy to detect.