Export of internal Abseil changes.
-- eca34da4ccb7bb6a580f1364dff9ca053418fa3b by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: Internal change. PiperOrigin-RevId: 214305433 -- 35393bdd21a87c4286f945fd34dda93afc4e0cd6 by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: Move some implementation details of string_view around to facilitate compiling on NVCC. Abseil does not officially support NVCC as a reminder. PiperOrigin-RevId: 214184876 -- 61846cab9ab9476a4676ecade7173f68978cd038 by Jorg Brown <jorg@google.com>: Move the initialization values for constants back to their declaration. PiperOrigin-RevId: 214135927 -- 7ac7df6c5f78f2faf419268c04618b936cb26065 by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: Performance improvements on format parser. PiperOrigin-RevId: 214032366 -- 90b4c0cf20e9feaa257a7ece40adaf7db40a60a7 by Xiaoyi Zhang <zhangxy@google.com>: Add static_assert check to absl::visit to make sure all overloads of the visitor return the same type, as required by the C++ standard. PiperOrigin-RevId: 213677001 -- 787995342101b4c181291cde9ecea3048536e4bd by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: Update comment to indicate finite durations are less than InfiniteDuration. PiperOrigin-RevId: 213660328 -- d78f0dce7cc31218807e96d93b9e8513b6c80b24 by Jon Cohen <cohenjon@google.com>: s/invariant/contract in the exceptions safety testing framework. This is a better term as these can be type invariants or function post conditions. They also are very similar ground as to what is covered by c++20 Contracts (and could even be replaced by them. PiperOrigin-RevId: 213631019 -- 0b3ff1a640de9a7391a6c233568802cf86245b0e by Abseil Team <absl-team@google.com>: Add noinline attribute for GetStackTrace/GetStackFrames/... so the skipped frames will not change because of inlining difference. PiperOrigin-RevId: 213009637 GitOrigin-RevId: eca34da4ccb7bb6a580f1364dff9ca053418fa3b Change-Id: Iff1022fd24e440fcbdf3c4ab2a915ca8954daa31
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ff1374008
commit
e01d95528e
15 changed files with 251 additions and 223 deletions
|
|
@ -548,21 +548,21 @@ TEST(ExceptionSafetyTesterTest, IncompleteTypesAreNotTestable) {
|
|||
// Test that providing operation and inveriants still does not allow for the
|
||||
// the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks a factory
|
||||
auto without_fac =
|
||||
testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithInvariants(
|
||||
testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithContracts(
|
||||
inv, testing::strong_guarantee);
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_fac));
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(HasUnaryTest(without_fac));
|
||||
|
||||
// Test that providing invariants and factory allows the invocation of
|
||||
// Test that providing contracts and factory allows the invocation of
|
||||
// .Test(op) but does not allow for .Test() because it lacks an operation
|
||||
auto without_op = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
|
||||
.WithInvariants(inv, testing::strong_guarantee)
|
||||
.WithContracts(inv, testing::strong_guarantee)
|
||||
.WithFactory(fac);
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_op));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(HasUnaryTest(without_op));
|
||||
|
||||
// Test that providing operation and factory still does not allow for the
|
||||
// the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks invariants
|
||||
// the invocation of .Test() and .Test(op) because it lacks contracts
|
||||
auto without_inv =
|
||||
testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(op).WithFactory(fac);
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(HasNullaryTest(without_inv));
|
||||
|
|
@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ std::unique_ptr<ExampleStruct> ExampleFunctionFactory() {
|
|||
|
||||
void ExampleFunctionOperation(ExampleStruct*) {}
|
||||
|
||||
testing::AssertionResult ExampleFunctionInvariant(ExampleStruct*) {
|
||||
testing::AssertionResult ExampleFunctionContract(ExampleStruct*) {
|
||||
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -593,16 +593,16 @@ struct {
|
|||
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
testing::AssertionResult operator()(ExampleStruct* example_struct) const {
|
||||
return ExampleFunctionInvariant(example_struct);
|
||||
return ExampleFunctionContract(example_struct);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} example_struct_invariant;
|
||||
} example_struct_contract;
|
||||
|
||||
auto example_lambda_factory = []() { return ExampleFunctionFactory(); };
|
||||
|
||||
auto example_lambda_operation = [](ExampleStruct*) {};
|
||||
|
||||
auto example_lambda_invariant = [](ExampleStruct* example_struct) {
|
||||
return ExampleFunctionInvariant(example_struct);
|
||||
auto example_lambda_contract = [](ExampleStruct* example_struct) {
|
||||
return ExampleFunctionContract(example_struct);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Testing that function references, pointers, structs with operator() and
|
||||
|
|
@ -612,28 +612,28 @@ TEST(ExceptionSafetyTesterTest, MixedFunctionTypes) {
|
|||
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
|
||||
.WithFactory(ExampleFunctionFactory)
|
||||
.WithOperation(ExampleFunctionOperation)
|
||||
.WithInvariants(ExampleFunctionInvariant)
|
||||
.WithContracts(ExampleFunctionContract)
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
|
||||
// function pointer
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
|
||||
.WithFactory(&ExampleFunctionFactory)
|
||||
.WithOperation(&ExampleFunctionOperation)
|
||||
.WithInvariants(&ExampleFunctionInvariant)
|
||||
.WithContracts(&ExampleFunctionContract)
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
|
||||
// struct
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
|
||||
.WithFactory(example_struct_factory)
|
||||
.WithOperation(example_struct_operation)
|
||||
.WithInvariants(example_struct_invariant)
|
||||
.WithContracts(example_struct_contract)
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
|
||||
// lambda
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
|
||||
.WithFactory(example_lambda_factory)
|
||||
.WithOperation(example_lambda_operation)
|
||||
.WithInvariants(example_lambda_invariant)
|
||||
.WithContracts(example_lambda_contract)
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -658,9 +658,9 @@ struct {
|
|||
} invoker;
|
||||
|
||||
auto tester =
|
||||
testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(invoker).WithInvariants(
|
||||
testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester().WithOperation(invoker).WithContracts(
|
||||
CheckNonNegativeInvariants);
|
||||
auto strong_tester = tester.WithInvariants(testing::strong_guarantee);
|
||||
auto strong_tester = tester.WithContracts(testing::strong_guarantee);
|
||||
|
||||
struct FailsBasicGuarantee : public NonNegative {
|
||||
void operator()() {
|
||||
|
|
@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, StrongGuaranteeFailure) {
|
|||
EXPECT_FALSE(strong_tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsBasicGuarantee{}).Test());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants : public NonNegative {
|
||||
struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts : public NonNegative {
|
||||
// After operator(), i is incremented. If operator() throws, i is set to 9999
|
||||
void operator()() {
|
||||
int old_i = i;
|
||||
|
|
@ -701,21 +701,21 @@ struct BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants : public NonNegative {
|
|||
|
||||
static constexpr int kExceptionSentinel = 9999;
|
||||
};
|
||||
constexpr int BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel;
|
||||
constexpr int BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants) {
|
||||
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts) {
|
||||
auto tester_with_val =
|
||||
tester.WithInitialValue(BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants{});
|
||||
tester.WithInitialValue(BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts{});
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(tester_with_val.Test());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(
|
||||
tester_with_val
|
||||
.WithInvariants([](BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants* o) {
|
||||
if (o->i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel) {
|
||||
.WithContracts([](BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts* o) {
|
||||
if (o->i == BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel) {
|
||||
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return testing::AssertionFailure()
|
||||
<< "i should be "
|
||||
<< BasicGuaranteeWithExtraInvariants::kExceptionSentinel
|
||||
<< BasicGuaranteeWithExtraContracts::kExceptionSentinel
|
||||
<< ", but is " << o->i;
|
||||
})
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
|
|
@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ struct HasReset : public NonNegative {
|
|||
void reset() { i = 0; }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
testing::AssertionResult CheckHasResetInvariants(HasReset* h) {
|
||||
testing::AssertionResult CheckHasResetContracts(HasReset* h) {
|
||||
h->reset();
|
||||
return testing::AssertionResult(h->i == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -759,14 +759,14 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, ModifyingChecker) {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsBasicGuarantee{})
|
||||
.WithInvariants(set_to_1000, is_1000)
|
||||
.WithContracts(set_to_1000, is_1000)
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(strong_tester.WithInitialValue(FollowsStrongGuarantee{})
|
||||
.WithInvariants(increment)
|
||||
.WithContracts(increment)
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
|
||||
.WithInitialValue(HasReset{})
|
||||
.WithInvariants(CheckHasResetInvariants)
|
||||
.WithContracts(CheckHasResetContracts)
|
||||
.Test(invoker));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, NonEqualityComparable) {
|
|||
return testing::AssertionResult(nec->i == NonEqualityComparable().i);
|
||||
};
|
||||
auto strong_nec_tester = tester.WithInitialValue(NonEqualityComparable{})
|
||||
.WithInvariants(nec_is_strong);
|
||||
.WithContracts(nec_is_strong);
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(strong_nec_tester.Test());
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(strong_nec_tester.Test(
|
||||
|
|
@ -833,14 +833,14 @@ struct {
|
|||
testing::AssertionResult operator()(ExhaustivenessTester<T>*) const {
|
||||
return testing::AssertionSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} CheckExhaustivenessTesterInvariants;
|
||||
} CheckExhaustivenessTesterContracts;
|
||||
|
||||
template <typename T>
|
||||
unsigned char ExhaustivenessTester<T>::successes = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, Exhaustiveness) {
|
||||
auto exhaust_tester = testing::MakeExceptionSafetyTester()
|
||||
.WithInvariants(CheckExhaustivenessTesterInvariants)
|
||||
.WithContracts(CheckExhaustivenessTesterContracts)
|
||||
.WithOperation(invoker);
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(
|
||||
|
|
@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ TEST(ExceptionCheckTest, Exhaustiveness) {
|
|||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(
|
||||
exhaust_tester.WithInitialValue(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>{})
|
||||
.WithInvariants(testing::strong_guarantee)
|
||||
.WithContracts(testing::strong_guarantee)
|
||||
.Test());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(ExhaustivenessTester<ThrowingValue<>>::successes, 0xF);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue