docs(snix/docs/TODO): drop builder TODOs
A mention of these different builders is included in the a footnote in the documentation, and various issues for the different TODOs were created: - #128 Implement bwrap-based Builder - #129 Implement gVisor-based builder - #130 Implement Cloud Hypervisor-based builder - #131 OCI builder: add preflight checks - #132 BuildService: refactor to be more granular Change-Id: I349b799e233ba8bef39a139cf2453d3214bb69b3 Reviewed-on: https://cl.snix.dev/c/snix/+/30474 Autosubmit: Florian Klink <flokli@flokli.de> Tested-by: besadii Reviewed-by: Jonas Chevalier <zimbatm@zimbatm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c1331c3d93
commit
ea90045ddc
2 changed files with 7 additions and 26 deletions
|
|
@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ These are only separated by [compiler preprocessor macros][ifdef] within the sam
|
|||
source files despite having very little in common with each other.
|
||||
|
||||
In Snix, the Builders need to implement a trait, and there are multiple
|
||||
implementations. In addition to an [OCI][] builder[^k8s], we also include a gRPC
|
||||
client (and server adapter), allowing to run the builder both locally or
|
||||
remotely, or plug in your entirely separate Builder, as long as it speaks the
|
||||
same gRPC protocol.
|
||||
implementations. In addition to an [OCI][] builder and plans for
|
||||
more[^other-builders], we currently include a gRPC client (and server adapter),
|
||||
allowing to run the builder both locally or remotely, or plug in your entirely
|
||||
separate Builder, as long as it speaks the same gRPC protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
Check `build/protos/build.proto` for a detailed description of the protocol,
|
||||
individual fields, and the tests in `glue/src/tvix_build.rs` for some examples.
|
||||
|
|
@ -96,8 +96,9 @@ regarding [Build Provenance][slsa-provenance].
|
|||
[frankenbuilds]: https://blog.layus.be/posts/2021-06-25-frankenbuilds.html
|
||||
[slsa-provenance]: https://slsa.dev/spec/v1.0/provenance
|
||||
|
||||
[^k8s]: With a well-defined builder abstraction, it's also easy to imagine
|
||||
other backends such as a Kubernetes-based one in the future.
|
||||
[^other-builders]: With a well-defined builder abstraction, it's also easy to imagine
|
||||
other backends such as a Kubernetes-based / bwrap / gVisor /
|
||||
Cloud Hypervisor in the future.
|
||||
[^reapi]: There have already been some discussions in the Nix community, to switch
|
||||
to REAPI:
|
||||
https://discourse.nixos.org/t/a-proposal-for-replacing-the-nix-worker-protocol/20926/22
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue