This commit fixes our handling of `throw` within an `assert`
condition.
Fixes: b/340
Change-Id: I40a383639ec266da50a853f16216b1b7868495da
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10318
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
error[E006]: expected value of type 'bool', but found a 'internal[catchable]'
--> src/tests/tvix_tests/notyetpassing/eval-okay-test-catchables-in-implications.nix:1:43
|
1 | (builtins.tryEval (({ foo ? throw "up" }: foo -> true) { })).success
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
Relates to b/345
Change-Id: Ic331c32ea59bf67ae775f485b444dc6804ca13d5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10289
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
This commit adds Opcode::OpJumpIfCatchable, which can be inserted
ahead of most VM operations which expect a boolean on the stack, in
order to handle catchables in branching position properly.
Other than remembering to patch the jump, no other changes should be
required.
This commit also fixes b/343 by emitting this new opcode when
compiling if-then-else. There are probably other places where we
need to do the same thing.
Change-Id: I48de3010014c0bbeba15d34fc0d4800e0bb5a1ef
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10288
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
This is a test case for b/343, wherein tvix dies if you try to
branch on an argument whose defaulted value is a catchable.
Change-Id: I891ca825e39ad14dda9f220f06d9591874fcd45d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10287
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This commit fixes b/338 by properly propagating catchables through
comparison operations.
Change-Id: I6b0283a40f228ecf9a6398d24c060bdacb1077cf
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10221
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Commit 05f42519b5 fixed b/281 by
establishing a hygiene regimen to partition *catchable* errors
(i.e. those which tryEval can detect) from all other errors, like
internal VM failures or I/O errors (which Nix must not be allowed to
detect, since these errors are fundamentally impure).
Unfotunately there are still cases where tvix assumes that anything
other than Value::Bool means it should panic!(). I found another
one, and added a test case for it in:
eval_okay_src_tests_tvix_tests_eval_okay_compare_ordering_catchable_nix
Not yet passing.
Change-Id: I69c62ed9ea5c8f81870e8de5c5fe12dcde849763
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10220
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This commit rewrites Value::nix_cmp_ordering() into an equivalent
nonrecursive form. Except for calls to Thunk::force(), the new form
no longer uses generators, and is async only because of the fact
that it calls Thunk::force().
I originally believed that this commit would make evaluation faster.
In fact it is slightly slower. I believe this is due to the added
vec![] allocation. I am investigating.
Prev-Nixpkgs-Benchmark: {"attrpath":"pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.hello.outPath","peak-kbytes":"460048","system-seconds":"0.68","user-seconds":"5.73"}
This-Nixpkgs-Benchmark: {"attrpath":"pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.hello.outPath","peak-kbytes":"460224","system-seconds":"0.67","user-seconds":"5.84"}
Change-Id: Ic627bc220d9c5aa3c5e68b9b8bf199837cd55af5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/10212
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
This explicitly documents behavior of C++ Nix that goes against the
intuition you'd gather from this document: that e.g. a simple select
from an attribute set causes a value to no longer be pointer equal to
its former self.
The point of documenting this is that we can show in a to be written
section on the use of pointer equality in nixpkgs that pointer equality
is only needed in a limited sense for evaluating it (C++ Nix's exterior
pointer equality). Tvix's pointer equality is far more powerful since
value identity preserving operations also preserve pointer equality,
generally speaking (this is because we implement interior pointer
equality in my made up terminology). This should eventually also be
documented.
Change-Id: I6ce7ef2d67b012f5ebc92f9e81bba33fb9dce7d0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8856
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
genericClosure has very limited support for pointer equality: It relies
on comparison (not equality!) in C++ Nix, so as soon as C++ Nix supports
comparing lists (langVersion >= 6) we can rely on pointer equality for
key.
Since Tvix uses equality, not comparison for the insert, our behavior is
currently different, as documented by the notyetpassing tests.
Change-Id: Ifcd741ed4fc3ccc3825f7038875d56a9918b786a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8720
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
In order for the test suite we have currently to be comparable to C++
Nix, we need to display values in the same way. This was largely the
case except in some weird cases.
* <CODE> for thunks and <CYCLE> for repeated thunks (?) are already in
use. <CODE> formatting is tested by the oracle test suite already.
* Instead of lambda, we need to use <LAMBDA>
* <<primop>> and <<primop-app>> (a formatting C++ Nix uses nowhere)
now are <PRIMOP> and <PRIMOP-APP>.
We'll probably want to have a fancier display of values (in a separate
trait) down the line. This could be used for interactive usage, e.g. the
REPL or a potential debugger.
There is a peculiarity with C++ Nix 2.3 formatting primops: import is
considered a <<PRIMOP-APP>>, since it is internally implemented by means
of scopedImport. This implementation detail no longer leaks in C++ Nix
2.13 nor in Tvix.
<CYCLE> display is untested at the moment, since we exhibit a
discrepancy to C++ Nix 2.3. Our current detection is more similar to C++
Nix 2.13—luckily it is also the more consistent of the two. See also
b/245.
Change-Id: I1d534434b02e470bf5475b3758920ea81e3420dc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8760
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This will eventually force us to have a base builtins set in common with
C++ Nix, i.e. all 2.3 builtins except the controversial
builtins.valueSize.
Change-Id: I2c767f07d6a14711911658e87da9f18ede57a143
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7747
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
