git-subtree-dir: users/wpcarro git-subtree-mainline:464bbcb15cgit-subtree-split:24f5a642afChange-Id: I6105b3762b79126b3488359c95978cadb3efa789
		
			
				
	
	
		
			102 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			2.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TypeScript
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			102 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			2.4 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TypeScript
		
	
	
	
	
	
| // The denomination of a coin.
 | |
| type Coin = number;
 | |
| 
 | |
| // The amount of change remaining.
 | |
| type Amount = number;
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Mapping of Coin -> Int
 | |
| type CoinBag = Map<Coin, number>;
 | |
| 
 | |
| function createCoinBag(coins: Coin[]): CoinBag {
 | |
|   const result = new Map();
 | |
| 
 | |
|   for (const coin of coins) {
 | |
|     result.set(coin, 0);
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
|   return result;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| // This algorithm should work conceptual, but it does not actually
 | |
| // work. JavaScript uses reference equality when constructing a Set<Map<A,B>>,
 | |
| // so my result.size returns a higher number than I expect because it contains
 | |
| // many duplicate entries.
 | |
| //
 | |
| // Conceptually, I'm not sure this solution is optimal either -- even after I
 | |
| // can dedupe the entries in `result`.
 | |
| function changePossibilities(amt: Amount, coins: Coin[]): number {
 | |
|   if (amt === 0) {
 | |
|     return 1;
 | |
|   }
 | |
|   const result: Set<CoinBag> = new Set();
 | |
| 
 | |
|   const q: [Coin, Amount, CoinBag][] = [];
 | |
| 
 | |
|   for (const coin of coins) {
 | |
|     const bag = createCoinBag(coins);
 | |
|     bag.set(coin, 1);
 | |
|     q.push([coin, amt - coin, bag]);
 | |
|   }
 | |
| 
 | |
|   while (q.length > 0) {
 | |
|     const [coin, amt, bag] = q.shift();
 | |
| 
 | |
|     console.log([coin, amt, bag]);
 | |
| 
 | |
|     if (amt === 0) {
 | |
|       result.add(bag);
 | |
|     } else if (amt < 0) {
 | |
|       continue;
 | |
|     } else {
 | |
|       for (const c of coins) {
 | |
|         const bagCopy = new Map(bag);
 | |
|         const value = bagCopy.get(c);
 | |
|         bagCopy.set(c, value + 1);
 | |
|         q.push([c, amt - c, bagCopy]);
 | |
|       }
 | |
|     }
 | |
|   }
 | |
|   console.log(result);
 | |
|   return result.size;
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Tests
 | |
| let desc = "sample input";
 | |
| let actual = changePossibilities(4, [1, 2, 3]);
 | |
| let expected = 4;
 | |
| assertEqual(actual, expected, desc);
 | |
| 
 | |
| desc = "one way to make zero cents";
 | |
| actual = changePossibilities(0, [1, 2]);
 | |
| expected = 1;
 | |
| assertEqual(actual, expected, desc);
 | |
| 
 | |
| desc = "no ways if no coins";
 | |
| actual = changePossibilities(1, []);
 | |
| expected = 0;
 | |
| assertEqual(actual, expected, desc);
 | |
| 
 | |
| desc = "big coin value";
 | |
| actual = changePossibilities(5, [25, 50]);
 | |
| expected = 0;
 | |
| assertEqual(actual, expected, desc);
 | |
| 
 | |
| desc = "big target amount";
 | |
| actual = changePossibilities(50, [5, 10]);
 | |
| expected = 6;
 | |
| assertEqual(actual, expected, desc);
 | |
| 
 | |
| // I think InterviewCake designed this assertion to be computationally
 | |
| // expensive.
 | |
| desc = "change for one dollar";
 | |
| actual = changePossibilities(100, [1, 5, 10, 25, 50]);
 | |
| expected = 292;
 | |
| assertEqual(actual, expected, desc);
 | |
| 
 | |
| function assertEqual(a, b, desc) {
 | |
|   if (a === b) {
 | |
|     console.log(`${desc} ... PASS`);
 | |
|   } else {
 | |
|     console.log(`${desc} ... FAIL: ${a} != ${b}`);
 | |
|   }
 | |
| }
 |