I created a strangely named Elisp module, >.el, just to appease the CI gods. My gut tells me that this is a desperate idea and fails the smell test. I'm pretty eager to pass the linting phase of my Elisp CI, however, and I can always revert this.
		
			
				
	
	
		
			29 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			943 B
		
	
	
	
		
			EmacsLisp
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			29 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			943 B
		
	
	
	
		
			EmacsLisp
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ;;; >.el --- Small utility functions -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;; Author: William Carroll <wpcarro@gmail.com>
 | |
| ;; Version: 0.0.1
 | |
| ;; URL: https://git.wpcarro.dev/wpcarro/briefcase
 | |
| ;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24"))
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;;; Commentary:
 | |
| ;; Originally I stored the `>>` macro in macros.el, but after setting up linting
 | |
| ;; for my Elisp in CI, `>>` failed because it didn't have the `macros-`
 | |
| ;; namespace.  I created this module to establish a `>-` namespace under which I
 | |
| ;; can store some utilities that would be best kept without a cumbersome
 | |
| ;; namespace.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;;; Code:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
 | |
| ;; Library
 | |
| ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
 | |
| 
 | |
| (defmacro >-> (&rest forms)
 | |
|   "Compose a new, point-free function by composing FORMS together."
 | |
|   (let ((sym (gensym)))
 | |
|     `(lambda (,sym)
 | |
|        (->> ,sym ,@forms))))
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| (provide '>)
 | |
| ;;; >.el ends here
 |